Thrainsson, 'On Icelandic Word Order Once More' H.a. Thrainsson, 'Bibliography of Diachronic Icelandic Syntax' Index Rognvaldsson, 'Bibliography of Modern Icelandic Syntax' E. Zaenen, 'The Nonuniversality of a Surface Filter' Bibliographies: H. Rognvaldsson, 'Null Objects in Icelandic' Long Distance Dependencies: J. Thrainsson, 'A Note on Icelandic Coordination' E. Rognvaldsson, 'We Need (Some Kind of a) Rule of Conjunction Reduction' J. Sigurosson, 'Moods and (Long Distance) Reflexives in Icelandic' Coordination: E. Thrainsson, 'A Semantic Reflexive in Icelandic' H. Maling, 'Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic' H. Anderson, 'The Grammar of Icelandic Verbs in -st' Reflexives: J. Andrews, 'Case Structures and Control in Modern Icelandic' S.R. Andrews, 'The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic' A.D. Zaenen, 'Preposition-Stranding and Passive' A.D. Maling, 'Unaccusative, Passive, and Quirky Case' J. Thrainsson, 'Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive' A. Maling, 'Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic' Verbs and Their Arguments: A. Sigursson, 'V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic' J. The modeling will show how the system can be improved in one important aspect by using lenient composition as defined in Karttunen (1998, 2005). In this paper I will argue that finite state power suffices and show how one of these mapping systems, Lexical Mapping Theory (LMT) as used in LFG can be straightforwardly modeled with finite state tools. A question that has not been asked explicitly about this mapping component is what its formal power should be. The proto-linguistic representation embodies assumptions about equivalence classes in the conceptualization of roles associated with various types of activities as they are expressed in verbs and other linguistic predicates. Perlmutter by Gerdts, Donna B., Moore, John C., Polinsky, Maria Many linguistic theories have a component that maps from a representation that I will call 'proto-linguistic' to whatever the syntactic representation used in the theory is. more Prepublication version of paper that app read in Hypothesis A / Hypothesis B : Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Prepublication version of paper that app read in Hypothesis A / Hypothesis B : Linguistic Explora. We agree with Potts on the label but not. A recent study by Christopher Potts classifies supplemental expressions as conventional implicatures. appositives, parentheticals), have not received much previous attention, although they are very common and a rich source of textual inferences. Some others, such as supplemental expressions (e.g. Some of those, such as factive and non-factive verbs, have received extensive attention in the past. In particular we discuss phenomena that have been studied as presuppositions or conventional implicatures in previous literature. Has an event mentioned in the text really occurred? Who is the source of the information? What is the stance of the author of the text? Does the author indicate whether he believes the source? We will survey some of linguistic conventions that indicate the author's commitment, or the lack thereof, to the propositions contained in her text. more This paper addresses the problem of assessing the veridicity of textual content. This paper addresses the problem of assessing the veridicity of textual content.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |